Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Language
Year range
1.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 279(8): 4181-4188, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1844361

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has resulted in a large number of patients requiring intubation and prolonged mechanical ventilation. The current knowledge on the tracheotomies regarding the time form intubation, method and ventilatory parameters optimal for their performance in the mechanically ventilated patients with COVID ARDS are scarce; thus, the aim of this study is to present new data regarding their safety, adverse events and timing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective observational study is based on the data of 66 critically ill COVID patients including demographic data, timing and technique of tracheotomy, ventilatory parameters in the time of procedure, as well as complication and survival rate. RESULTS: A number of 66 patients with COVID-related pneumonia were included in the study, among whom 32 were tracheotomized-25 patients underwent an early tracheotomy and 7 patients had late tracheotomy. The median duration of mechanical ventilation before the tracheotomy in the early group was 8 days (IQR 6-10) compared to 11 days (IQR 11-12.5.) p < 0.001) in late group. Risk of death in tracheotomy patients was significantly growing with growing level of PEEP and FiO2 at the moment of decision on tracheotomy, OR = 1.91 CI95 (1.23;3.57); p = 0.014 and OR = 1.18 CI95(1.03;1.43); p = 0.048, respectively. CONCLUSION: Early percutaneous tracheotomy is safe (both in terms of risk of viral transmission and complication rate) and feasible in COVID-19 patients. Stability of gas exchange, and ventilatory parameters are the main prognostic factors of the outcome.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , SARS-CoV-2 , Tracheotomy/adverse effects
2.
researchsquare; 2021.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-724114.v2

ABSTRACT

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has altered all aspects of how the healthcare system is organized, and impacted patients with head and neck cancer (HNC), who delayed diagnosis and treatment. The result was the increased admission of patients with severe dyspnea and a need for tracheotomy due to extremely advanced HNC. The aim of this study was evaluate the characteristics of two multi-center cohorts of HNC patients admitted for dyspnea. Methods: .. The therapeutic activity of four University Departments of Otolaryngology was studied over two time periods: September-February 2019/2020 and 2020/2021. Results: . A group of 136 HNC patients who underwent tracheotomy in two time cohorts, pre-COVID-19 (N = 59) and COVID-19 (N = 77), were analyzed. The mean tracheotomy incidence proportion was 1.82% (SD: 1.12) for the pre-COVID-19 and 3.79% (SD: 2.76) for the COVID-19 period. A rise in emergency dyspnea was observed in the COVID-19 cohort. In the pre-COVID-19 period, 66% of patients presented with symptoms for more than a month in comparison to 78% of patients in COVID-19 times (p = 0.04). The number of tracheotomies performed under general anesthesia dropped in favor of local anesthesia during COVID-19 (64% vs. 56% respectively) due to extremely advanced HNC. In the COVID-19 cohort, most patients received a telemedicine consultation (N = 55, 71%) compared to the pre-COVID-19 period (N = 14, 24%). Conclusions: . There should be a reorganization of the referral system, an adjustment of treatment capacity for an increased number of HNC patients, and a reserve for more extensive resection and reconstruction surgeries in ENT departments to not hamper future HNC treatment if there is another pandemic wave.


Subject(s)
Sialic Acid Storage Disease , Dyspnea , Neoplasms , COVID-19 , Head and Neck Neoplasms
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL